[ Forum Index ] [ Information ] [ Meme Media ] [ About Tony ]

Posted by toby on 28th September 2010 at 02:35:28

In response to Re: One rant deserves another posted by quad on 28th September 2010 at 02:30:20

And it also has to be repeated that Mathematica just isn't that great. It's dangerous to have an "assumed excellent" tool, "polished" for optimal marketability, with all kinds of problems swept under a proprietary carpet (see sci.math.symbolic for regular examples).Is Mathematica the Windows Vista 7 of applied math? There doesn't seem to be any difference in either development or business methodology. |

^{Next Newer Thread}^{"Mathematica is unscientific" - toby 10:14:38 14-Sep-10}- Belated recovery even here -
*23:18:19 09-Jan-11* - Re: "Mathematica is unscientific" -
**GingerYeo***02:15:34 06-Nov-10* ^{Be careful what you wish for - Tony 20:21:53 22-Sep-10}^{ }^{Re: One rant deserves another - toby 01:51:31 17-Sep-10}- Re: One rant deserves another -
**nif***22:18:53 17-Sep-10* - Re: One rant deserves another -
**toby***00:27:39 21-Sep-10* - Re: One rant deserves another -
**nif***20:30:09 24-Sep-10* ^{Re: One rant deserves another - quad 02:30:20 28-Sep-10}^{Re: One rant deserves another - toby 02:08:05 28-Sep-10}- Re: One rant deserves another -
**toby***00:53:15 21-Sep-10* - Burdening with expectations -
**Tony***15:36:23 14-Sep-10* - Re: Burdening with expectations -
**quad***02:45:43 28-Sep-10* - Re: Burdening with expectations -
**toby***01:53:54 17-Sep-10* ^{Next Older Thread}